Economic and Class Voting in a Model of Redistribution with Social Concerns (joint with Edoardo Grillo) (link) (back to home page)
We investigate how concerns about social status may
affect individuals' preferences for redistribution. In our model, agents are
heterogeneous across two dimensions, productivity and social class, and an
individual's social status is defined as his relative standing in terms of a
weighted average of these two components. The weight on each component depends
positively on its standard deviation. Redistribution thus simultaneously
affects labor supply and the weights that determine social status. As such,
taxation not only redistributes resources from the rich to the poor but also becomes
a way of preserving or modifying social status. Thus, individuals who have the
same productivity but belong to different social classes support different tax
rates. We characterize the equilibrium of the political game as the solution of
a system of non-linear equations and identify the interclass coalition of
voters who support the equilibrium tax rate.
Keywords: economic voting, class voting,
social status, voting, redistribution.
JEL Classification: D10, D63, H23.
Curious about the Price? Consumers’ Behavior in Price Reveal Auctions (joint with Giuseppe Sorrenti) (link) (back to home page)
We exploit several specific features of a recent online selling
mechanism, the so-called price reveal auction, to empirically investigate how
consumers' behavior changes in response to an item's intrinsic characteristics
and `social attributes'. We document a significant effect of the item's brand
and intended use (outdoor vs. indoor) in influencing an agent's degree of
impatience and willingness to pay. We show that, while both variables have some
explanatory power when considered in isolation, it is their interaction that
really matters. We also study the determinants of the mechanism's profitability
and show how, in the context of a price reveal auction, the sale of positional
goods may backfire and harm revenues.
Keywords: price reveal auction, willingness
to pay, social attributes, positional goods.
JEL Classification: D44, D12.
A Model of Educational Investment, Social Concerns and Inequality (joint with Edoardo Grillo) (link) (back to home page)
We consider a model in which educational investments
entail productivity gains, signaling power, and social returns. The latter
depend on the relative position that an agent occupies in one of three
different dimensions: (i) his innate characteristics,
(ii) his level of schooling, and (iii) his level of income. The agent enjoys
social prestige (or suffers from social stigma) if he overperforms
(or underperforms) in the relevant dimension. We highlight that fine details in
the modelling of social concerns have significant implications on the pattern
of inequality within society. In particular, we show that if prestige is
relatively stronger than stigma, social concerns always lead to an increase in
inequality both in terms of educational achievements and
income. In contrast, if stigma is stronger than prestige, we show that
inequality may either increase or decrease depending on the relevant social
dimension.
Keywords: education,
signaling, social status, inequality.
JEL Classification: D03, D10, I20, I21.
A Heuristic Approach to Rent-Seeking Contests with Private Information (back to home page)
We propose a heuristic method for explicitly solving
rent-seeking contests in which participants have heterogeneous and private
valuations. The heuristic requires only common knowledge about the mean of the
distribution of valuations. We obtain a closed-form solution for an agent's
level of investment and subject it to comparative statics analysis. We then
assess the performance of the heuristic through a series of simulations. The
proposed method provides a remarkably effective approximation of the optimal
solution that would emerge in a context of perfect information for a wide range
of model specifications.
Keywords: rent-seeking contests, private
information, heuristics.
JEL Classification: D72, D82.
Optimal Stealing Time (link) (back to home page)
We study a dynamic game in which players can steal parts
of a homogeneous and perfectly divisible pie from each
other. The effectiveness of a player's theft is a random function
which is stochastically increasing in the share of the pie the agent
currently owns. We show how the incentives to preempt or to follow the rivals
change with the number of players involved in the game and investigate the
conditions that lead to the occurrence of symmetric or asymmetric equilibria.
Keywords: stealing,
stochastic games, optimal timing, pie allocation.
JEL Classification: C72, D31.
Equilibrium selection through pu-dominance (link) (back to home page)
This note introduces and discusses the concept of pu-dominance in the
context of finite games in normal form. It then presents the pu-dominance criterion for equilibrium selection. The pu-dominance criterion is inspired by and closely related to the
p-dominance criterion (Morris et al., 1995) but it presents some advantages. In
particular, we provide sufficient conditions under which equilibrium selection
through pu-dominance is weakly finer than
equilibrium selection through p-dominance.
Keywords: equilibrium
selection, normal form games, pu-dominance, p-dominance.
JEL Classification: C72, C73
Strategic Announcements of Reference Points in Disputes and Litigations (back to home page)
We show how the common occurrence of seeing exceedingly
high claims in disputes and litigations about how to share a limited resource
can be rationalized by a model in which claimants display reference dependent
preferences, expect the judge to use a generalized social welfare function, and
strategically announce their reference points. The scope of the model is wide
as the resource over which the dispute arises can be positive or negative,
exogenously given or endogenously determined. Moreover, the social welfare
specification is consistent with a number of different liability rules.
Keywords: reference
points, claims, litigations.
JEL Classification: D03, D63, K41.
Self-Serving Biased Reference Points (back to home page)
This paper formalizes the notion of self-serving bias
within a framework of reference-dependent preferences. We argue that the bias affects
agents’ expectations in a systematic way and, through this channel, also
influences their reference points. We derive some general results both at the
individual and the aggregate level and then apply the model to two common
situations: a bankruptcy problem and a litigation between two parties. In the
first case, we introduce a new allocative rule that, in a context of
self-serving biased reference points, outperforms existing ones in terms of the
efficiency of the selected allocation. In the second case, we show how the
possibility that agents have self-serving biased reference points does not
affect the incidence of trials but may increase the probability of appeals
against the judge’s verdict.
Keywords:
self-serving bias, reference dependent preferences, expectations, bankruptcy
problem, litigation.
JEL classification: D03, K41, D63.
Price Reveal Auctions (back to home page)
A price reveal auction is a Dutch auction in which the
current price of the item on sale remains hidden. Bidders can privately observe
the price only by paying a fee, and every time a bidder does so, the price
falls by a predetermined amount. We solve for the perfect Bayesian equilibria
of the game. If the number of participants n is common knowledge, then in
equilibrium at most one bidder observes the price and the profits that the
mechanism raises, if any, are only marginally higher than those that would stem
from a normal sale. If instead n is a
random variable then multiple entry can occur and profitability is enhanced.
Keywords: price
reveal auctions, pay-per-bid auctions.
JEL classification: D44, C72.
Lowest Unique Bid Auctions with Signals (back to home page)
A lowest unique bid auction allocates a good to the agent
who submits the lowest bid that is not matched by any other bid. This peculiar
auction format is becoming increasingly popular over the Internet. We show that
when all the bidders are rational such a selling mechanism can lead to positive
profits only if there is a large mismatch between the auctioneer's and the
bidders' valuation. On the contrary, the auction becomes highly lucrative if at
least some bidders are myopic. In this second case, we analyze the key role
played by the existence of some private signals that the seller sends to the
bidders about the status of their bids. Data about actual auctions confirm the
profitability of the mechanism and the limited rationality of the bidders.
Keywords: lowest
unique bid auctions, signals, bounded rationality.
JEL classification: D44, C72, D82.
The Neglected Effects of Demand Characteristics on the Sustainability of Collusion (back to home page)
According to traditional IO models, the characteristics
of market demand (intercept, slope, elasticity) and of technology (level of
symmetric marginal costs) do not play any role in defining the sustainability
of collusive behaviors in Bertrand oligopolies. The paper modifies this
counterintuitive result by showing that all the above mentioned factors do
affect the sustainability of collusion when prices are assumed to be discrete
rather than continuous. The sign of these effects is unambiguous. Their
magnitude varies greatly: in some cases it is totally
negligible, in others it becomes extremely relevant.
Keywords:
collusion, market demand, Bertrand supergames.
JEL Classification: L13, L41.
Education, Dynamic Signalling and Social Distance (back to home page)
In many European countries the average level of education
has grown steadily over the last few generations. The paper shows how such a
trend can be easily rationalized by a model that extends a standard signaling
game in two directions. First, a temporal structure is induced by having two
different cohorts of individuals playing the game. Second, in addition to
standard rational agents, the model postulates the existence of two classes of
agents that care about their relative position in the distribution of
educational choices. Conformist individuals wish to be close to the average
level; status seeking individuals seek to be above it. Results show that the
presence of these two classes of individuals generates an average level of
education that changes and increases over time for a wide range of choice of
parameters. Consequences of this increasing level of education on the behaviour
of the firms are also explored.
Keywords:
education, signalling, status seeeking, conformist behaviour.
JEL Classification: I20, D82.
Best Responding to What? A Behavioural Approach to One Shot Play in 2x2 Games (back to home page)
We introduce a simple procedure to be used for selecting the
strategies most likely to be played by inexperienced agents who interact in one
shot 2x2 games. We start with an axiomatic description of a function that may
capture players' beliefs. Various proposals connected with the concept of mixed
strategy Nash equilibrium do not match this description. On the other hand
minimax regret obeys all the axioms. Therefore we use minimax regret to
approximate players' beliefs and we let players best respond to these
conjectured beliefs. When compared with existing experimental evidences about
one shot matching pennies games, this procedure correctly indicates the choices
of the vast majority of the players. Applications to other classes of games are
also explored.
Keywords:
prediction, beliefs, mixed strategy Nash equilibrium, minimax regret, matching
pennies, experiments.
JEL Classification: C72, C91.
Some Equivalence Results between Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibria and Minimax Regret in 2x2 Games (back to home page)
We show that in any 2x2 game in which a unique mixed
strategy Nash equilibrium exists, the probability distribution that this
equilibrium assigns to player i is either the same or the mirror image of the
distribution that the minimax regret criterion defines for player j. Sharper
results that connect the two distributions for the same player are then
established for the class of symmetric games.
Keywords: mixed
strategy Nash equilibria, minimax regret .
JEL Classification: C72, C92.
Un Bilancio dell’Esperienza UMTS in Europa: fu Collusione? (back to home page)
Something relevant happened in the mobile
telecommunications field in the last two years: the allocation of the UMTS
licenses, needed to supply the new third generation services, heavily involved
the governments of all European countries and the most important telecom
companies in the world. At the same time, it called the attention of the media
and of the public opinion. After the run to 3G licenses finished a few months
ago, it is now possible to draw up a first balance of the UMTS experience at a
continental level. In both the two categories winners and losers can easily be
spotted. But other interesting points arise: can the actual allocation be
considered stable? Has competition been limited on purpose in some auctions?
Did a secret plan exist, a plan devoted to share the European market among the
biggest operators in their different areas of influence?
Keywords:
auctions, telecommunications, collusion..
JEL classification: D44, L96.
Some Social Welfare Implications of Behavioral Preferences (back to home page)
We investigate how the assumption that individuals are
characterized by some recent forms of behavioral preferences changes the
analysis of an otherwise classical welfare problem, namely the optimal
allocation of a scarce resource among a finite number of claimants. We consider
two preference specifications: inequity aversion and reference dependence. In
the latter case we also study the implications of the claimants displaying a
self serving bias when setting their reference point. Using standard welfare
criteria, we compute the optimal allocations that a benevolent social planner
should implement in the various scenarios. Results are often remarkably
different with respect to traditional (i.e., rational preferences) analysis. We
discuss the policy implications and the role of a social planner.
Keywords: social
welfare, optimal allocation, inequity aversion, reference dependence, self
serving bias.
JEL classification: D01, D61.